Looking back: The Niagara Escarpment really is underrated
Plus, thoughts on birding, ornithology, and elitism.
TWiB is taking a week off, though I am applauding Punxsutawney Phil and Woodstock Willie. Fingers crossed for six more weeks of winter (Phil’s prediction).
This post about my visit to Canada was originally published on September 9, 2024.
Most people don’t set out to visit the Niagara Escarpment, but there’s a good chance that you know of its treasures.
As Troy McClure used to say on “The Simpsons,” you may remember the escarpment from such wonders as Wisconsin’s Door County, Ontario’s Bruce Peninsula, and the Niagara Falls. It’s a 650-mile spine of Silurian dolomite that’s stood the test of glaciers and eons of weathering.
The escarpment runs from northeast Wisconsin through the Door Peninsula, the narrow land mass that juts out from the rest of Wisconsin in the east. It makes up a string of islands in Lake Michigan and then stretches to the rocky beaches of Michigan’s Garden Peninsula and points eastward to Manitoulin Island, Ontario. From there, it’s south and east through Ontario’s Bruce Peninsula and across central Ontario to the Niagara region all the way to Rochester, NY.
Now, what does this all have to do with birding? Everything, of course. The escarpment encompasses some incredible habitat and umpteen acres of forests, lakes, meadows, and wetlands. Birds are finding what they need in oh-so-many areas along the escarpment. Just consider the explosion of American White Pelicans in Lake Michigan’s Green Bay, a body of water hemmed in by the escarpment on the east. Or the rare Black Tern that inhabits estuaries and marshes throughout the region.
Canada appears to celebrate the escarpment moreso than the United States. The popular Bruce Hiking Trail follows the escarpment for nearly 500 miles across Ontario, from Tobermory to the Toronto suburbs and the Niagara region. It’s a geography that is home to cold, snowy winters and warm summers and breezes that make the conditions just right for growing grapes for wine.
Some landforms just don’t get the attention they deserve. In Door County, Wisconsin, anyone who’s been to Peninsula State Park would recall the rugged cliffs on the edge of Lake Michigan—that’s the Niagara Escarpment. But one could do worse than spend time exploring every nook and cranny of this rim of rock through the center of the continent.
Separating birders from ornithologists is more than splitting hairs
I was struck by a piece by Ryan Mandelbaum who wrote on his
Substack a review of Kenn Kaufman’s latest book, “The Birds That Audubon Missed.”Mandelbaum centers in on a key distinction, that between amateur birders and trained ornithologists. To the untrained eye, there could appear to be quite a bit of overlap—and there is during field trips, festivals, volunteer projects, and certain other settings. But there’s often a rather large chasm between the two groups, too. Start with the fact that ornithologists are typically in the industry as a vocation, whereas birders are in it as an avocation. This holds for many other fields. Just think of golf. One of us might play our local nine-hole course on the weekend, but that is nowhere near the level of seriousness and purpose that someone on a professional tour possesses. Even a teaching pro or a club professional would look at golf in quite a different way than a weekend duffer.
Further, trained ornithologists are just that—trained. They’ve invested inordinate time, energy, and money into their education. There may not be a parallel for the amateur birder, short of spending time looking for birds, poring through field guides, or serving as a citizen science volunteer.
John James Audubon embodied this, too, just not in the way one might expect. Audubon himself was a painter and writer, rather than a scientist. He was mostly excluded from elite scientist circles when he pitched his work in Philadelphia, the nation’s hub of science at the time. He was an outsider, and it would be decades before his work was popularized and even then it wasn’t through traditional scientific circles.
Mandelbaum points out the paradox of Audubon being an outsider while in the broader sense also being an insider culturally and societally. He takes this a step further by noting that in the present-day “[birding] is still largely inaccessible to, and in some cases actively excludes, the same folks traditionally left out of establishment science, especially Black and indigenous people of color.”
This is true and birding and science more broadly needs continued focus on engaging non-traditional audiences. The only thing I’d add is there’s a bigger problem of elitism in birding that needs to be addressed simultaneously. That elitism excludes all sorts of people who quickly conclude “birding isn’t for them” or “I’m not good enough” after some initial birding experiences. I hate to generalize, but I will as someone who’s done this their whole life—many, many birders are terribly unwelcoming to newcomers, especially women. Many who try to be welcoming are so awkward socially that they come across as unwelcoming know-it-alls. This thread has been present as long as I’ve been birding. That’s why I applaud groups like the Feminist Bird Club and others who emphasize inclusiveness over competitiveness and tallying the most birds. It’s an attempt to create a birding world that engages a wider set of people and especially those typically considered outsiders.
Thanks to all who’ve taken the step to become a paid subscriber. If you’d like to show your support for this newsletter, click the button above. The vast majority of subscribers receive this newsletter for free because of your support.
If you liked this post, you also might like this one from almost a year ago:
A mild winter's impact on an Arctic hawk
Woodstock Willie was right. This year we have an early spring.
thanks for mentioning my post, Bob! totally agree with your point on elitism and new birders. and the other thing i’ll add to that is that sometimes the elitism is a trait that newer birders pick up relatively quickly so they fit in, further alienating the greenest birders and those not in it solely for the list.
Looking forward to Phil's prediction being correct!